blog 2

On my second observation, I noticed how Dan Gaters again started a message and people began replying to it. He asked if people thought that Marbury should be waived or not. Some of the responses were funny and the debate even turned somewhat political. One guy said Marbury returning is like letting Bush return for a third term. Another guy commented on the economy and asked if people would still want Marbury if the alternative was Republican Vice President Sarah Palin. There doesn't seem to be much arguing, most people agreeing that Marbury is a cancer to the NY Knicks. Dan Gater seems to dominate the postings on what I observed today. There also seems to be some spam, but not as much as the other groups I looked at joining before which is good.